1.北京中医药大学第三附属医院 北京 100029
2.首都医科大学宣武医院
张艺,女,在读硕士生
#郑琴,女,副主任医师,硕士生导师,E-mail:13691383573@163.com
纸质出版日期:2021-03-30,
收稿日期:2020-07-06,
移动端阅览
张艺, 曲淼, 孙文军, 等. 疏肝健脾法治疗阈下抑郁肝郁脾虚证随机对照双盲研究[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(2):3-8.
张艺, 曲淼, 孙文军, 等. 疏肝健脾法治疗阈下抑郁肝郁脾虚证随机对照双盲研究[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(2):3-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2021.02.002.
目的
2
观察疏肝健脾法治疗阈下抑郁肝郁脾虚证的临床疗效。
方法
2
采用随机、对照、双盲的研究方法,将100例阈下抑郁肝郁脾虚证患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,每组各50例,剔除脱落病例后,对照组47例、治疗组48例。治疗组患者服用解忧开郁方,对照组患者服用安慰剂,治疗12周,随访1年,观察临床疗效、汉密尔顿17项抑郁量表(17-item Hamilton depression scale,HAMD-17)和中医证候量表的评分,并进行安全性评估。
结果
2
治疗12周,HAMD-17评定结果示:对照组47例中,临床控制2例、显著进步4例、进步12例、无效29例,总有效18例,总有效率为38.30%;治疗组48例中,临床控制12例、显著进步11例、进步15例、无效10例,总有效38例,总有效率为79.16%。经广义估计方程分析,Wald
χ
2
=18.383,
P
<
0.001,说明治疗组临床疗效优于对照组。治疗12周,中医证候量表评定结果示:对照组47例中,临床控制0例、显著进步4例、进步10例、无效33例,总有效14例,总有效率为29.79%;治疗组48例中,临床控制20例、显著进步14例、进步10例、无效4例,总有效44例,总有效率为91.67%。经广义估计方程分析,Wald
χ
2
=44.861,
P
<
0.001,说明治疗组中医证候疗效优于对照组。治疗后12个月随访,对照组12例转化为抑郁症,转化率为25.53%,治疗组6例转化为抑郁症,转化率为12.50%。治疗期间未发生严重不良反应。
结论
2
疏肝健脾法对阈下抑郁肝郁脾虚证具有较好的临床疗效,并且可防止其向抑郁症的发展。
Objective
2
To observe the clinical efficacy of soothing the liver and invigorating the spleen in the treatment of subthreshold depression of liver depression and spleen deficiency.
Methods
2
The method of random
controlled and double-blind was conducted. 100 cases of subthreshold depression with liver depression and spleen deficiency syndrome were randomly divided into control group and treatment group
50 cases in each group. After excluding the falling off cases
47 cases were in the control group and 48 cases were in the treatment group. The patients in the treatment group were treated with Jie-you-kai-yu recipe
while the patients in the control group were given placebos. After 12 weeks of treatment and 1 year of follow-up
the clinical efficacy
Hamilton Depression Scale and TCM Syndrome Scale were observed
and the safety was evaluated.
Results
2
After 12 weeks of treatment
the results of Hamilton Depression Scale showed that: in the control group
2 cases were clinically controlled
4 cases had significant progress
12 cases had progress
29 cases were ineffective
18 cases were effective
and the total effective rate was 38.30%; in the treatment group
12 cases were clinically controlled
11 cases were significant progress
15 cases were progress
10 cases were ineffective
38 cases were effective
and the total effective rate was 79.16%. Generalized linear analysis
Wald chi square =18.383
P
<
0.001
showed that the clinical efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. After 12 weeks of treatment
TCM syndrome scale evaluation results showed that: in the control group
there was 0 case which were clinically controlled
4 cases of significant progress
10 cases of progress
33 cases of ineffective
14 cases of effective
and the total effective rate was 29.79%; in the treatment group of 48 cases
20 cases of clinical control
14 cases of significant progress
10 cases of progress
4 cases of no effect
the total effective rate was 91.67%. According to the generalized linear analysis
Wald chi square = 44.861
P
<
0.001
indicating that the therapeutic effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group. After 12 months of follow-up
12 cases in the control group were transformed into depression
with the conversion rate of 25.53%
and 6 cases in the treatment group were transformed into depression
with the conversion rate of 12.50%. No serious adverse reactions occurred during the treatment.
Conclusions
2
The method of soothing the liver and invigorating the spleen has a definite effect on subthreshold depression of liver depression and spleen deficiency
and can prevent it from developing into depression.
阈下抑郁疏肝健脾法解忧开郁方随机对照双盲汉密尔顿抑郁量表中医证候量表
Subthreshold depressionSoothing the liver and invigorating the spleenJie-you-kai-yu recipeRandomized controlled double-blindHamilton Depression scaleTCM Syndrome scale
CUIJPERS P, SMIT F. Subthreshold depression as a risk indicator for major depressive disorder: asystematic review of prospective studies[J].Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,2004,109(5):325-331.
KROENKE K. When and how to treat subthreshold depression[J].JAMA,2017,317(7):702-704.
TAKAHASHI K, TAKADA K, HIRAO K. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone application intervention for subthreshold depression[J].Early Interv Psychiatry,2019,13(1):133-136.
JUDD L L, SCHETTLER P J, AKISKAL H S. The prevalence, clinical relevance, and public health significance of subthreshold depressions[J].Psychiatr Clin North Am,2002,25(4):685-698.
谭曦,刘燨,杜渐,等.阈下抑郁的团体中医心理干预研究[J].中医学报,2014,29(9):1364-1367.
LYNESS J M, HEO M, DATTO C J, et al. Outcomes of minor and subsyndromal depression among elderly patients in primary care settings[J].Ann Intern Med,2006,144(7):496-504.
KESSLER R C, ZHAO S, BLAZER D G, et al. Prevalence, correlates, and course of minor depression and major depression in the National Comorbidity Survey[J].J Affect Disord,1997,45(1-2):19-30.
高强,王一浩,林景峰,等.基于复杂系统熵方法的抑郁症中医综合调理方案的文献研究[J].现代中医临床,2018,25(1):30-34.
NABER D, BULLINGER M. Should antidepressants be used in minor depression?[J].Dialogues Clin Neurosci,2018,20(3):223-228.
田青,郑琴,杨歆科,等.阈下焦虑抑郁的中医证候学规律研究[J].北京中医药,2018,37(2):128-131.
张金鹏,有明妍,张怡淳,等.阈下抑郁辨识工具及判定标准[J].世界中医药,2019,14(6):1425-1428.
中华中医药学会.中医内科常见病诊疗指南[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2008:294-296.
曲淼,唐启盛,裴清华,等.运用相关性分析方法探讨抑郁症中医核心病机的研究[J].北京中医药大学学报,2011,34(8):565-568.
曲淼,孙文军,徐向青,等.益肾调气法治疗肾虚肝郁型抑郁症的多中心、随机、对照临床研究[J].世界中医药,2019,14(7):1710-1718.
薛博瑜,吴伟.中医内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:284-285.
赵迪,任杰,安海燕.肝主疏泄的源流追溯及现代研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2017,23(2):289-291.
高雪松,王永志,李丽,等.疏肝类中药复方干预抑郁症药理机制的研究进展[J].现代中医临床,2018,25(2):46-49.
朱敏捷,王祖承,徐鹤定.安慰剂效应的认识与临床应用[J].国外医学·精神病学分册,2002,29(1):48-50.
FOURNIER J C, DERUBEIS R J, HOLLON S D, et al. Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis[J].JAMA,2010,303(1):47-53.
0
浏览量
9
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构