北京中医药大学 北京 100029
蔡俊豹,男,在读硕士生
# 孙晓光,男,博士,教授,硕士生导师,E-mail: sxg6428@163.com
纸质出版日期:2021-05-30,
收稿日期:2021-01-10,
移动端阅览
蔡俊豹, 沈晓倩, 吴绮凡, 等. 程国彭与费伯雄虚劳观的分析与比较[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(3):47-51.
Junbao Cai, Xiaoqian Shen, Qifan Wu, et al. Cheng Guopeng Versus Fei Boxiong in the treatment of consumptive diseases[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2021,28(3):47-51.
蔡俊豹, 沈晓倩, 吴绮凡, 等. 程国彭与费伯雄虚劳观的分析与比较[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(3):47-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2021.03.011.
Junbao Cai, Xiaoqian Shen, Qifan Wu, et al. Cheng Guopeng Versus Fei Boxiong in the treatment of consumptive diseases[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2021,28(3):47-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2021.03.011.
程国彭与费伯雄均为清代著名医家,对虚劳的证治俱有特色,本文试从二者的学术思想中的虚劳观加以分析并比较,程国彭认为气血相较重在血,阴阳相较重在阴;虚劳之治止嗽为先,重清滋亦重温补;精损可成劳,经闭亦可成劳;五脏劳损当补先天之本;治虚劳重在养生调摄。费伯雄则认为虚劳之损需分阴阳;五脏之劳不可专归于肾;七情之伤必归本于心;虚劳之治重在脾肾。二者论治虚劳都注重饮食调理及精神调摄,在温补脾肾方面同中有异,通过比较分析有助于进一步了解二者学术思想,对临床辨治慢性消耗性疾病颇有启发。
Cheng Guopeng and Fei Boxiong were both famous TCM practitioners in the Qing Dynasty. They both had their own characteristics in the treatment of consumptive diseases. Cheng Guopeng held that blood was more important when compared with Qi
and that Yin was more important when compared with Yang; as for the treatment of consumptive diseases
the first step is to arrest coughing
and equal attention is given to the treatment methods of clearing and enriching
and warming and tonifying. Moreover
for the damage of five zang organs
the kidney
foundation of prenatal existence
should be supplemented; the treatment of consumptive diseases is focused on health preservation and regulation. Fei Boxiong held that the impairments of consumptive diseases should be divided into Yin and Yang; exertions of the five zang organs should not be attributed only to the kidney; the impairments of the seven emotions should be eventually attributed to the heart; the treatment of consumptive diseases should be focused on the spleen and kidney. Both of the two practitioners paid attention to dietary care and mental regulation in the treatment of consumptive diseases
and had similarities and differences in warming and tonifying the spleen and kidney. This comparative analysis is helpful to further understand their academic thoughts
which is quite enlightening for the clinical treatment of chronic consumptive diseases.
虚劳费伯雄程国彭费批医学心悟
consumptive diseasesFei BoxiongCheng GuopengFei Pi Yi Xue Xin Wu
程国彭.医学心悟[M]费伯雄,批注.费季翔,校勘.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1998.
夏洁楠. 中医虚劳理论研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2015.
谢观.中国医学源流论[M].余永燕,点校.福州:福建科学技术出版社,2003.
欧阳建军,刘伍立,陈国茜,等.月华丸(胶囊)治疗结核研究进展[J].中医药导报,2016,22(2):109-112.
戴天章.重订广温热论[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,2010.
江涵暾.笔花医镜[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
田思胜.杂病源流犀烛[M].北京:人民卫生出版社.2006.
陈修园.珍本医书集成 14 杂著类 医医偶录[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1986.
程国彭.医学心悟[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
费伯雄.校注医醇剩义[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1963.
赵艳.清代名医费伯雄家系及生平事略考[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2012,18(8):907-908.
陈小翠,张玉萍.《王九峰医案》补肾法浅析[J].中医文献杂志,2000(2):15-16.
王鹏.费伯雄医著大成[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2019.
0
浏览量
8
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构