南京中医药大学附属南京市中西医结合医院 江苏 210014
高敏行,男,在读硕士生
# 黄子慧,女,主任中医师,硕士生导师,E-mail:huangzihui73@163.com
纸质出版日期:2021-09-30,
收稿日期:2020-07-31,
移动端阅览
高敏行, 黄子慧, 朱思洵, 等. 泄毒生新外治法治疗溃疡型淋巴结结核的临床疗效观察[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(5):28-33.
Minxing Gao, Zihui Huang, Sixun Zhu, et al. Clinical observation of the external application of toxin-discarding and tissue-promoting regeneration method for ulcerative lymph node tuberculosis[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2021,28(5):28-33.
高敏行, 黄子慧, 朱思洵, 等. 泄毒生新外治法治疗溃疡型淋巴结结核的临床疗效观察[J]. 现代中医临床, 2021,28(5):28-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2021.05.007.
Minxing Gao, Zihui Huang, Sixun Zhu, et al. Clinical observation of the external application of toxin-discarding and tissue-promoting regeneration method for ulcerative lymph node tuberculosis[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2021,28(5):28-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2021.05.007.
目的
2
观察泄毒生新外治法治疗溃疡型淋巴结结核的临床疗效。
方法
2
将60例溃疡型淋巴结结核患者随机分为治疗组30例、对照组30例。剔除脱落病例后治疗组30例、对照组26例。治疗组在常规治疗基础上予复方五凤草液治疗,对照组在常规治疗基础上予Ⅱ号丹治疗。观察2组临床疗效、临床体征积分、创面愈合率、创面腐去时间、换药疼痛强度。
结果
2
2组临床疗效比较,治疗组30例中,治愈14例,好转14例,无效2例,总有效28例,总有效率为93.3%;对照组26例中,治愈11例,好转13例,无效2例,总有效24例,总有效率为92.3%。经秩和检验,
Z
=-2.45,
P
=0.034,
P
<
0.05,说明治疗组疗效优于对照组。2组临床体征积分比较,治疗组临床体征积分改善比对照组明显,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.01)。2组创面愈合率比较,治疗组愈合率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.01)。2组创面腐去时间比较,对照组创面腐去时间比治疗组短,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。2组换药疼痛强度比较,治疗组换药疼痛强度明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
泄毒生新外治法治疗溃疡型淋巴结结核有良好的临床疗效。
Objective
2
To explore the clinical efficacy of toxin-discarding and tissue-regenerating method for ulcerative lymph node tuberculosis.
Methods
2
Sixty patients with ulcerative lymph node tuberculosis were randomly assigned to the treatment group (
n
=30) and the control group (
n
=30). There were 30 cases in the treatment group and 26 cases in the control group
with the withdrawal or drop-outs excluded. The treatment group was treated with compound Wufengcao Liquid in addition to the conventional treatment
and the control group was treated with No.Ⅱ Dan on the basis of the conventional treatment. The clinical efficacy of the two groups
clinical sign scores
the wound healing rate
the time to decompose the wound
and the pain intensity of dressing change were observed.
Results
2
In terms of the clinical efficacy
of the 30 cases in the treatment group
14 cases were cured
14 cases improved
2 cases were ineffective
with a total effective rate of 93.3%; of the 26 cases in the control group
11 cases were cured and 13 cases improved
2 cases were ineffective
with a total effective rate of 92.3%. After rank sum test
Z
=-2.45
P
=0.034
P
<
0.05
it indicates that the efficacy was higher in the treatment group than in the control group. As for the scores of TCM syndromes
in the two groups
the scores of TCM syndromes improved more in the treatment group than in the control group
and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.01). As for the wound healing rate
the healing rate was higher in the treatment group than in the control group
and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.01). As for the time of wound decay
the time of wound decay was shorter in the control group than in the treatment group
and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05). As for the pain intensity of dressing change
the pain intensity of dressing change was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group
and the difference was statistically significant (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusions
2
The toxin-discarding and tissue-regenerating method has good clinical effects in the treatment of ulcerative lymph node tuberculosis.
溃疡型淋巴结结核泄毒生新外治临床疗效创面愈合
ulcerative lymph node tuberculosistoxin-discarding and tissue-regeneratingexternal treatmentclinical efficacywound healing
刘万里,黄子慧. 淋巴结结核中西医诊疗学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2018:3-4.
黄子慧. 五凤草液外用治结核性窦道83例[J].江西中医药,2008,39(5):38-39.
谢惠安. 现代结核病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:311.
中医病证诊断疗效标准编审委员会. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:43.
靳汝辉,黄子慧,薛倩一,等. 切开疗法与拖线疗法治疗淋巴结核窦道的临床效果比较[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2018,38(11):1332-1335.
罗一婷,翁榕星,周芳,等. 2019 WHO全球结核报告:全球与中国关键数据分析[J].新发传染病电子杂志,2020,5(1):47-50.
任坦坦,陆普选,邓国防,等. 2020 WHO全球结核报告:全球与中国关键数据分析[J].新发传染病电子杂志,2020,5(4):280-284.
WANG X Q, YANG Z H, FU Y Y, et al. Insight to the epidemiology and risk factors of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Tianjin,China during 2006-2011[J/OL].Plos One,2014,9(12):e112213[2020-06-02].https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112213https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112213.
邓红霞,吴兵兵,秦甜. 颈淋巴结结核中医外治法应用体会[J].中医外治杂志,2016,25(3):59-60.
GLAZIOU P, FLOYD K, RAVIGLIONE M C. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis[J].Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,2018,39(3):271-285.
太平惠民和剂局. 太平惠民和剂局方[M].陈庆平,陈冰鸥,校注. 北京:中国中医药出版社,1996:196.
何秀娟,刘青武,陈佳,等. 掺药治疗皮肤溃疡研究进展[J].北京中医药,2020,39(6):647-651.
徐学春. 瘰疬证治[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1987:111-125.
周雪亮,朱军,王大伟,等. 中药丹剂中毒致严重多器官功能障碍综合征1例[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2019,37(5):491-493.
刘忠恕. 丹药的过去、现在和将来[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,1997,3(3):70-71.
季炳武,陈伯仪,陈仲伟,等.九一丹研究综述[J].中医外治杂志,2020,29(6):73-75.
梁博文,李华.白及粉治疗体表淋巴结结核窦道的疗效观察[J].中医临床研究,2011,3(17):77,79.
方斐,郎雅珍,金姗姗,等.中药外敷联合抗结核药物治疗淋巴结结核51例疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2018,56(23):61-63.
黄子慧,洪练青,张国英,等.复方五凤草液对结核性溃疡的临床研究[J].陕西中医,2018,39(9):1257-1259.
赵杰,吴繁荣,韩续,等.泽漆化学成分研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2016,51(3):383-388.
万大群,赵仁全,刘海,等.白及的成分、药理作用和临床应用研究进展[J].中国药业,2017,26(2):93-96.
熊英,陈虹,邓敏芝,等.猫爪草化学成分及抗耐药结核活性研究[J].中药材,2016,39(4):775-777.
0
浏览量
20
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构