1.天津中医药大学 天津 301617
2.天津市津南区咸水沽镇卫生院
3.天津市河西区中医医院
程晓燕,女,主治医师
#陈泽林,男,博士,教授、主任医师,博士生导师,E-mail:chenzelin328@163.com
纸质出版日期:2022-01-30,
收稿日期:2020-06-28,
移动端阅览
程晓燕, 陈泽林, 李飞. 走罐联合桂枝茯苓胶囊干预慢性盆腔炎合并盆腔积液寒湿凝滞证患者的临床观察*[J]. 现代中医临床, 2022,29(1):1-4,10.
Xiaoyan CHENG, Zelin CHEN, Fei LI. Moving Cupping &
程晓燕, 陈泽林, 李飞. 走罐联合桂枝茯苓胶囊干预慢性盆腔炎合并盆腔积液寒湿凝滞证患者的临床观察*[J]. 现代中医临床, 2022,29(1):1-4,10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2022.01.001.
Xiaoyan CHENG, Zelin CHEN, Fei LI. Moving Cupping &
目的
2
观察走罐联合桂枝茯苓胶囊干预慢性盆腔炎(CPID)合并盆腔积液寒湿凝滞证患者的临床疗效。
方法
2
将60例CPID合并盆腔积液寒湿凝滞证患者随机分为治疗组30例、对照组30例,剔除脱落病例后治疗组26例、对照组29例。对照组口服桂枝茯苓胶囊,治疗组在对照组基础上配合走罐疗法。观察2组中医证候疗效、中医症状积分、腰骶部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、盆腔积液变化情况。
结果
2
治疗后治疗组26例中,痊愈0例,显效8例,有效17例,无效1例,总有效率为96.15%;对照组29例中,痊愈0例,显效6例,有效19例,无效4例,总有效率为86.21%。经秩和检验,
Z
=-1.737,
P
=0.082,
P
>
0.05,说明2组中医证候疗效无统计学差异。治疗后治疗组中医症状积分均较本组治疗前减少(
P
<
0.05)。对照组除大便异常外,其余中医症状积分均较本组治疗前减少(
P
<
0.05)。2组腰骶部疼痛VAS评分治疗后较本组治疗前均降低(
P
<
0.05),治疗组较对照组降低明显(
P
<
0.05),2组治疗前后积分差值比较,差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。2组盆腔积液量治疗后较本组治疗前均减少(
P
<
0.05),2组前后差值比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
走罐联合桂枝茯苓胶囊干预CPID合并盆腔积液寒湿凝滞证患者具有较好的临床疗效。
Objective
2
To observe the clinical effect of moving cupping combined with
Guizhi
Poria Capsules on chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID) combined with pelvic fluid of the cold dampness stagnation pattern.
Methods
2
Sixty patients with CPID and pelvic effusion of the cold dampness stagnation pattern were randomly assigned to the treatment group (
n
=30) and control group (
n
=30). After the withdrawals excluded
there were 26 left in the treatment group and 26 in the control group. The control group received
Guizhi
Poria Capsules orally
and the treatment group received additional moving cupping treatment. The curative effect of TCM syndrome
TCM symptom score
Visual Analogue Scale/Score(VAS score) of lumbosacral pain and change in pelvic effusion were observed.
Results
2
After treatment
among the 26 cases in the treatment group
0 case was cured
8 cases were effective
17 cases were effective and 1 case was ineffective
with a total effective rate of 96.15%. In the control group
0 case was cured
6 cases were effective
19 cases were effective and 4 cases were ineffective
with a total effective rate of 86.21%. According to the rank-sum test
Z
=-1.737
P
=0.082
P
>
0.05
it indicated that there was no statistical difference in TCM syndrome efficacy between the two groups. After treatment
the scores of TCM symptoms in the treatment group were decreased
as compared with those before treatment (
P
<
0.05). In the control group
except for abnormal stools
the scores of other TCM symptoms were decreased compared with those before treatment (
P
<
0.05). The lumbosacral pain score was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group
and the difference was statistically significant before and after treatment (
P
<
0.05). VAS scores of lumbosacral pain in both groups were decreased after treatment
as compared with before treatment (
P
<
0.05)
and significantly decreased in the treatment group than in the control group (
P
<
0.05). The amount of pelvic fluid was significantly decreased in both groups after treatment
as compared with before treatment (
P
<
0.05)
but there was no statistical difference between the two groups before and after treatment (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusions
2
Moving cupping combined with
Guizhi
Poria Capsules has a good clinical effect on CPID combined with pelvic fluid of the cold dampness stagnation pattern.
走罐桂枝茯苓胶囊慢性盆腔炎盆腔积液腰骶胀痛寒湿凝滞证临床研究
moving cuppingGuizhi Poria Capsuleschronic pelvic inflammatory diseasepelvic effusionlumbosacral distending paincold dampness stasisclinical study
曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:1211-1217.
纵艳艳,陈衍秋,胡赛玲.中西医结合治疗慢性盆腔炎合并盆腔积液的临床分析[J].中华全科医学,2016,14(6):1059-1060.
郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:245-253.
谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:258-264.
陈泽林.图解推拿罐疗法[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2017.
余楠楠,陈泽林,陈波,等.天人地三部走罐法的内涵解释[J].上海针灸杂志,2015,34(3):260-264.
巢元方.诸病源候论[M].宋白杨,校注.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2011:3.
陈自明.妇人大全良方[M].刘洋,校注.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2011:288.
张玉珍.中医妇科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2012:320.
张连军.郭志强治疗慢性盆腔炎所致痛经经验[J].河北中医,2013,35(11):1608-1609.
王国红.益肾温通法治疗慢性盆腔炎临床体会[J].吉林中医药,2001,12(6):15.
张劲松.综合方法治疗慢性盆腔炎102例[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2013,11(11):40-41.
冯潇潇,姚魁武,袁圆,等.经方在慢性盆腔炎合并盆腔积液治疗中的价值探讨[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2015,21(23):216-219.
阮越容,范氏凤,董莉.中医治疗慢性盆腔炎临床研究进展[J].山东中医药大学学报,2016,40(3):293-296.
陈泽林.中国罐疗法溯源——《五十二病方》角法研究[J].天津中医药,2013,30(2):87-89.
王谧,李月,陈泽林.拔罐疗法概述与走罐手法述要[J].天津中医药大学学报,2009,28(4):217.
陈筑芳,邱德文,付文心,等.罐疗及其研究的历史与现状[J] .贵阳中医学院学报,2001,23(1):1-3.
张洁,杨从敏,赵凌,等.基于数据挖掘技术探析针灸治疗慢性盆腔炎选穴规律[J].中华中医药杂志,2016,31(8):3028-3032.
赵义静,刘佩东,陈泽林,等.不同参数督脉走罐对亚健康人体背部局部皮肤血流量影响的初步观察[J].天津中医药大学学报,2015,34(1):18-21.
李静.走罐法治疗痛证机制及临床疗效分析[J].中华针灸电子杂志,2013,2(4):176-178.
0
浏览量
25
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构