肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合影响的临床研究

刘建乔; 吴承东; 刘仍海; 张羽; 李宇栋

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2022.05.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合影响的临床研究

临床研究 | 更新时间：2022-10-17

- 肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合影响的临床研究
- Clinical study of the efficacy of a TCM hip bath formula for wound healing of patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward
- 现代中医临床 2022年29卷第5期页码：7-12,18
- 作者机构：
  
  1.首都医科大学附属北京中医医院肛肠科　北京　100010
  2.北京中医药大学东方医院肛肠科
- 作者简介：
  
  刘建乔，男，硕士，主治医师
  #吴承东，男，副主任医师，E-mail：wuchengdong2@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  北京市优秀人才培养资助青年骨干个人项目(2018000021469G253);北京中医医院院级课题暨两院合作课题(YJ－201723)
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2022.05.002
  中图分类号： R266
- 纸质出版日期：2022-09-30，
  
  收稿日期：2020-12-18，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘建乔, 吴承东, 刘仍海, 等. 肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合影响的临床研究[J]. 现代中医临床, 2022,29(5):7-12,18.

LIU Jianqiao, WU Chengdong, LIU Renghai, et al. Clinical study of the efficacy of a TCM hip bath formula for wound healing of patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2022,29(5):7-12,18.
刘建乔, 吴承东, 刘仍海, 等. 肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合影响的临床研究[J]. 现代中医临床, 2022,29(5):7-12,18. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2022.05.002.

LIU Jianqiao, WU Chengdong, LIU Renghai, et al. Clinical study of the efficacy of a TCM hip bath formula for wound healing of patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward[J]. Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine, 2022,29(5):7-12,18. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.2095-6606.2022.05.002.

摘要

目的

观察肛肠坐浴方对肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合的影响。

方法

将92例肛肠疾病湿热下注证术后患者随机分为治疗组46例、对照组46例。治疗组予肛肠坐浴方泡洗治疗，对照组予3%硼酸溶液洗剂泡洗治疗。观察2组临床疗效、创面愈合率、创面愈合时间、临床症状评分(肛周创面伤口疼痛、创面渗液和创面水肿评分)、血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平、创面成纤维细胞含量、创面胶原纤维面积。

结果

治疗组46例中，痊愈28例，显效12例，有效4例，无效2例，总有效率为95.65%；对照组46例中，痊愈24例，显效8例，有效5例，无效9例，总有效率为80.43%。经秩和检验，

＝－2.237，

＝0.025，说明治疗组临床疗效明显优于对照组。治疗组在术后第7、14天创面愈合率均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。治疗组创面愈合时间为(13.41±4.86) d，对照组创面愈合时间为(15.76±5.31) d，治疗组较对照组缩短明显，差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。2组术后不同时间肛周创面疼痛评分比较结果显示：术后第3天开始，2组肛周创面疼痛评分逐渐降低，不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(

0.05)；2组间肛周创面疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(

0.05)，治疗组的肛周创面疼痛评分明显低于对照组；随着治疗时间的延长，治疗组与对照组的肛周创面疼痛评分降低幅度不同，治疗组明显优于对照组(

0.05)。2组术后不同时间肛周创面渗液评分比较结果显示：术后第3天开始，2组肛周创面渗液评分逐渐降低，不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(

0.05)；2组间肛周创面渗液评分差异有统计学意义(

0.05)，治疗组的肛周创面渗液评分明显低于对照组；随着治疗时间的延长，治疗组与对照组的肛周创面渗液评分降低幅度不同，治疗组明显优于对照组(

0.05)。2组术后不同时间肛周创面水肿评分比较结果显示：术后第3天开始，2组肛周创面水肿评分逐渐降低，不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(

0.05)；2组间肛周创面水肿评分差异有统计学意义(

0.05)，治疗组的肛周创面水肿评分明显低于对照组；随着治疗时间的延长，治疗组与对照组的肛周创面水肿评分降低幅度不同，治疗组明显优于对照组(

0.05)。2组术后不同时间血清CRP水平比较：术后第3天开始，2组患者血清CRP水平逐渐降低，不同时间点间差异有统计学意义(

0.05)；2组间血清CRP水平差异有统计学意义(

0.05)，治疗组血清CRP水平明显低于对照组；随着治疗时间的延长，治疗组与对照组的血清CRP水平降低幅度不同，治疗组明显优于对照组(

0.05)。治疗组镜下成纤维细胞数为(75.24±18.86)个，对照组镜下成纤维细胞数为(42.67±16.75)个，说明治疗组明显优于对照组，2组比较差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。治疗组镜下胶原纤维面积(31.37±8.00)%，对照组镜下胶原纤维面积(23.47±8.29)%，说明观察组明显优于对照组，2组比较差异有统计学意义(

0.05)。

结论

肛肠坐浴方可促进肛肠疾病湿热下注证患者术后创面愈合，减轻术后相关症状，缩短创面愈合时间。

Abstract

Objective

To observe the effect of a TCM hip bath formula on postoperative wound healing of patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward.

Methods

92 patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward who have undergone operations were randomly divided into the treatment group (46 cases) and the control group (46 cases). The treatment group was given hip baths and the control group was treated with 3% boric acid solution. The clinical efficacy

wound healing rate

wound healing time

clinical symptom scores (perianal wound pain

wound exudation and wound edema scores)

serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level

wound fibroblast content and wound collagenous fiber area were observed.

Results

In the treatment group of 46 cases

28 cases were cured

12 cases were significantly effective

4 cases were effective

2 cases were ineffective

and the total effective rate was 95.65%; In the control group of 46 cases

24 cases were cured

8 cases were significantly effective

5 cases were effective

and 9 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate was 80.43%. The rank sum test showed

=-2.237

=0.025

indicating that the clinical efficacy of the treatment group is significantly better than that of the control group. The wound healing rate of the treatment group was better than that of the control group on the 7th and 14th day after operation

and the difference was statistically significant (

0.05). The wound healing time in the treatment group was (13.41±4.86) d

and that in the control group was (15.76±5.31) d

suggesting that it took a significantly shorter amount of time for the treatment group to heal than for the control group

and the difference was statistically significant (

0.05). The comparison of perianal wound pain scores between the two groups at different times after operation showed that from the third day after operation

the perianal wound pain scores of the two groups gradually decreased

and the differences between the various time points was statistically significant (

0.05); There was significant difference in the pain scores of perianal wounds between the two groups (

0.05). The pain scores of perianal wounds in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group; With the extension of treatment time

the pain scores of perianal wounds in the treatment group and the control group decreased differently

and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (

0.05). The comparison of perianal wound exudation scores between the two groups at different times after operation showed that from the third day after operation

the perianal wound exudation scores of the two groups gradually decreased

and the difference between different time points was statistically significant (

0.05); There was significant difference in perianal wound exudation scores between the two groups (

0.05). The perianal wound exudation scores of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group; With the extension of treatment time

the reduction of perianal wound exudation scores in the treatment group and the control group was different

and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (

0.05). The comparison of perianal wound edema scores between the two groups at different times after operation showed that the perianal wound edema scores of the two groups gradually decreased from the third day after operation

and the difference between different time points was statistically significant (

0.05); There was significant difference in perianal wound edema scores between the two groups (

0.05). The perianal wound edema scores of the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group; With the extension of treatment time

the reduction of perianal wound edema scores in the treatment group and the control group was different

and the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (

0.05). Comparison of serum CRP levels in the two groups at different times after operation: from the third day after operation

the serum CRP levels in the two groups gradually decreased

and the difference between different time points was statistically significant (

0.05); There was significant difference in the level of serum CRP between the two groups (

0.05). The perianal serum CRP in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group; With the extension of treatment time

the reduction of serum CRP in the treatment group was different from that in the control group

and the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group (

0.05). The number of fibroblasts under microscope in the treatment group was (75.24±18.86) and that in the control group was (42.67±16.75)

indicating that the treatment group was significantly better than the control group

and the difference was statistically significant (

0.05). The area of collagen fibers under microscope in the treatment group was (31.37±8.00)% and that in the control group was (23.47±8.29)%

indicating that the treatment group was significantly better than the control group

and the difference was statistically significant (

0.05).

Conclusions

The hip bath can promote wound healing of patients with anorectal diseases characterized by damp-heat pouring downward

relieve postoperative related symptoms

and shorten wound healing time.

关键词

肛肠术后肛肠坐浴方创面愈合湿热下注证

Keywords

postoperative care of anorectal diseasesTCM hip bath formulawound healingdamp-heat pouring downward

references

陈平，韩宝，周璐，等.中国居民肛肠疾病患病工作相关因素调查[J].中国公共卫生，2017, 33(11): 1628-1631.

张凯烨，王福宽.冰芒散外吹在肛肠疾病术后伤口疼痛及水肿的临床观察[J].中医外治杂志，2020, 29(4): 23-24.

李华山，李宇飞.中药坐浴熏洗治疗肛门病术后并发症的用药规律分析[J].北京中医药，2017, 36(2): 116-119.

王羽侬，王顺梅，唐莹，等.中医药促进创面愈合机制研究进展[J].中国医药导报，2014, 11(19): 156-158.

中华中医药学会.中医肛肠科常见病诊疗指南：ZYYXH/T322－341－2012[M].北京：中国中医药出版社，2012: 2-11.

郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M].北京：中国医药科技出版社，2002: 286-289.

罗雯鹏，李克亚，王真权.松花粉外用联合复方芩柏颗粒坐浴对湿热型肛瘘患者术后创面愈合相关生长因子及肛肠动力学的影响[J].中医药导报，2021, 27(4): 100-104.

刘凤玲.紫草创愈膏涂擦促进低位单纯性肛瘘术后创面愈合临床研究[J].河北中医药学报，2020, 35(2): 20-22.

RUSHING C J，SPINNER S M，HARDIGAN P.The visual analogue scale for pain：a comparison of scores reported to residents versus an attending foot and ankle surgeon[J].Foot & Ankle Specialist，2019, 13(3): 1-4.

吴本升，杨建华，王晓鹏，等.紫黄生肌膏联合中药熏洗促进混合痔术后创面愈合的临床观察[J].中华中医药杂志，2019, 34(1): 419-422.

刘新红，李铭杰.重组牛碱性成纤维细胞生长因子联合高压氧对肛肠病术后创面愈合的影响[J].医学信息，2020, 33(14): 151-152.

李振宇，吴承东，刘建乔，等.祛毒汤熏洗对湿热下注证混合痔外剥内扎术后患者的影响[J].现代中医临床，2020, 27(3): 19-22, 38.

吴龙龙，徐昊阳，张刘强，等.地榆化学成分与药理作用研究进展[J].世界科学技术－中医药现代化，2022, 24(1): 360-378.

张瑞峰，曾阳，刘力宽，等.侧柏叶的化学成分与药理学作用研究进展[J].中国野生植物资源，2021, 40(4): 53-56.

王天宁，刘玉婷，肖凤琴，等.马齿苋化学成分及药理活性的现代研究整理[J].中国实验方剂学杂志，2018, 24(6): 224-234.

聂文佳，徐帅师，张咏梅.蒲公英有效成分及其药理作用研究进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报，2020, 22(7): 140-145.

王艳宏，张晴晴，邢希旺，等.矿物药明矾研究进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报，2021, 23(10): 17-20.

王华富，桂志红，丁汀，等.马齿苋配方颗粒对2型糖尿病患者血糖和炎症因子的影响[J].中医学报，2016, 31(3): 348-350.

毛叶勤，陈琳，吴育，等.蒲公英水提物对大鼠溃疡性结肠炎的作用[J].中成药，2022, 44(3): 752-757.

韩强，柳国斌，严仕梦，等.紫朱软膏通过抑制炎症反应促进糖尿病足溃疡愈合的研究[J].海南医学院学报，2020, 26(21): 1617-1629.

李萍.疮疡生肌理论的中医研究[M].北京：中国中医药出版社，2019: 6.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于微环境生态观察生肌玉红膏对犬咬伤创面愈合的促进作用

泄毒生新外治法治疗溃疡型淋巴结结核的临床疗效观察

拔罐促进肛瘘术后创面愈合的临床疗效评价

生肌液复合封闭负压引流技术对创面愈合的影响